As part of a series of posts dedicated to reviewing a Mid-Rise Developer’s options for selecting the most appropriate structural system for the project, this post is dedicated to iSpan Systems. We will review the aspects of this system that are critical to a Developer’s decision-making process, such as quality, speed, and cost.
INTRODUCTION
iSpan is a complete structural solution designed for LSF (Light Steel Framing) using CFS (Cold-Formed Steel). From a 10,000ft view, this system is typically recommended for buildings ranging from 5 to 10 floors, with 6 to 8 being probably their most efficient and competitive market segment. Lower than 5 floors, the wooden alternatives can be more attractive, and above 10 floors, the design becomes so complicated that this system loses most of its competitive edge. Developers can use this system in all types of mid-rise buildings such as hotels, condominiums, institutions and custom homes.
TRADITIONAL COMPETITOR
SPEED
QUALITY ASSURANCE
- Comprehensive Engineering – As a construction manager, I’ve witnessed firsthand how thorough the engineering side of the business works.
- Pre-fabricated elements – The fact that the material is manufactured in a controlled environment means that the product delivered to the job site has minimum possible flaws compared to wood which can always bring surprises with itself.
- The simplicity of Assembly – Being easy to assemble means less room for the installation crew to make mistakes and create problems on the job site.
LOGISTICS
Convenient Storage & Staging
VIBRATION, ACOUSTIC, & FIRE RATINGS
COST
PROS
- Total Structural Solution – Unlike many other innovative structural solutions in the market, iSpan has the ability to provide a total structural solution that eliminates the need for multiple trades and structural elements. This leads to fewer scope gaps, less coordination, and a smoother construction process.
- Good for tight mid-rise construction sites – The inherent characteristics and features of the iSpan systems make it ideal for tight construction sites that cannot accommodate massive cranes or large laydown areas.
- Cost Savings – iSpan might not be the cheapest system in the market in a one-to-one comparison, but it can indirectly save a lot of money for the project if properly designed and incorporated into the construction process.
CONS
- Fire Rating – Almost all iSpan flooring assemblies depend on the layer of drywall underneath to achieve the required vertical fire separation. This brings some challenges to the construction process. This means that once the design is complete, it is costly (and sometimes hard) to change the penetration location on the floor.
- Proprietary Design – iSpan products are all part of a proprietary system. This means there are limits to what the project’s structural engineer can or cannot do when it comes to the structure’s design.
- Single Source Provider – Although a major steel manufacturing player backs iSpan, the fact that it is a single-source product makes it riskier in terms of supply compared to some of its more traditional competitors.